Sunday, February 22, 2009

A crime or sentimentally art?


2 weeks ago, it was condemned at 50 hours of social works to a group of twentyish, for dirtying the thoroughfare. The 7 arrested admitted they were painting in the street Pinto de Calleja nº12, but they were assuring that it was for a good reason. In the compound judgment last week, the supposed delinquents affirmed that the reason for which they were painting was that there had been murdered 2 years behind to his partner and nobody had produced either worship or respect to this place that for them was so important.

 

The boys in concrete they were putting (nails?) in the wall of the building of which they were hanging globes full of paint of colours . Once hung they were placing to a certain distance and were shooting darts of plastic to break the globes. Those of the part of above were of blood-red color characterizing the blood of his friend, and them of below they were white of a side and blacks to other one, trying to mean the tranquility of the deceased person and the darkness of the death that leaves his more darlings.

 

The youngs were saying to be repented for having painted where it is not necessary, but on the other hand, proud for having claimed the mourning to his friend. The judge was convinced so much by the dedication and admiration of these boys for his late partner, that it raised the dictated judgment and allowed them to end his sentimentally work of art.

1 comment:

  1. HI AMANDA
    I'M SO SORRY FOR NOT MARKING THIS SOONER. THIS IS AN EXCELLENT STORY. YOU DID EXACTLY WHAT I WANTED YOU TO DO AND IT IS VERY WELL WRITTEN. IT'S QUITE INTERESTING TO. DO YOU AGREE WITH THE JUDGE'S SENTENCE? I DO. IT'S VERY BEAUTIFUL THAT THESE YOUNG BOYS CHOSE TO RESPOND TO THEIR FRIEND'S DEATH IN THIS NON-VIOLENT WAY.


    A crime or sentimental(ly) art?

    2 weeks ago, A GROUP OF 20 YEAR OLDS WERE (it) was condemned (at) TO 50 hours of social work(s) (to a group of twentyish), for (dirtying) VANDALIZING the thoroughfare. The 7 WHO WERE arrested admitted they were painting in the street Pinto de Calleja nº12, but they (were assuring) CLAIMED that it was for a good reason. In the (compound judgment) HEARING last week, the supposed delinquents affirmed that the reason (for which) they HAD BEEN (were) painting was that 2 YEARS AGO THEIR FRIEND (there) had been murdered (2 years behind to his partner) THERE and nobody had (produced) either worshipPED or PAID respectS to this place that (for them) was so important TO THEM.



    The boys (in concrete they) were putting nails in the wall of the building (of which) WHERE they were hanging BALLOONS (globes) full of COLOURED paint of colours). Once hung they were (placing to) STANDING AT a certain distance and were shooting PLASTIC darts (of plastic) to break the (globes) BALLOONS. Those HUNG UP (of the part of) above were FILLED WITH (of) A blood-red color characterizing the blood of (his) THEIR friend, and THOSE HUNG (them of) below (they) were white of (a) ONE side and black(s) ON (to) other one, (trying to mean) REPRESENTING the tranquility of the deceased person and the darkness (of the death) that DEATH leaves his (more darlings) LOVED ONES.



    The (youngs) YOUTHS (were saying to be) SAID THEY repented for having painted where (it is not necessary) THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE, but on the other hand, THEY WERE proud for having (claimed the mourning to his) MOURNED THE DEATH OF THEIR friend. The judge was convinced so much by the dedication and admiration of these boys for (his late) THEIR DEAD FRIEND (partner), that (it raised) HE LIFTED THE SENTENCE ( the dictated judgment) and allowed them to (end his) FINISH THEIR sentimental(ly) work of art.

    ReplyDelete